Former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah stirred controversy along with his assertion questioning the execution of Afzal Guru, convicted for the 2001 Parliament assault. Abdullah stated that the hanging “served no function” and that the J&Okay authorities, had it been concerned, wouldn’t have authorized Guru’s execution.
Abdullah’s opposition to Capital Punishment
Abdullah reiterated his stance in opposition to capital punishment, citing situations the place courts have been confirmed flawed after executions. He emphasised his perception that the execution didn’t convey justice to the area.
“The Jammu and Kashmir authorities had nothing to do with Afzal Guru’s execution, in any other case you would need to do with the state authorities’s permission, which I can inform you in no unsure phrases would have been forthcoming. I do not consider any function was served by executing him,” Abdullah stated in a dialog with information company ANI.
He stated, “Proof has proven us time and time once more, it might not be in India, however in different international locations, that you’ve got executed folks and located that you’re flawed.”
BJP and Congress react
BJP chief Sajid Yousuf responded, stating that Guru’s execution was vital for justice in J&Okay. In the meantime, Congress distanced itself from Abdullah’s feedback, with chief Salman Khurshid refusing to have interaction within the dialogue throughout election time.
J&Okay elections on the horizon
Abdullah’s remarks come as J&Okay gears up for its first meeting elections for the reason that abrogation of Article 370, with voting set to start on September 18.
Additionally learn | Jammu-Kashmir Meeting Elections 2024: PDP fields Adv Syed Gh Nabi Bukhari for Langate seat