Metropolis advocate recordsdata Public Curiosity Litigation in Mysuru Court docket itemizing 9-point attraction
Mysuru: Within the gentle of alleged irregularities within the Mysuru City Improvement Authority (MUDA) in regards to the allocation of web sites underneath the 50:50 ratio scheme, a major growth has emerged.
The Lokayukta Police have filed a First Info Report (FIR) towards Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, his spouse Parvathi, and three others. In response, Advocate S. Arunkumar from town filed a Public Curiosity Litigation (PIL) in a Metropolis Court docket yesterday (Oct. 1), searching for to completely declare all websites allotted by MUDA underneath the 50:50 ratio scheme since 2015 as null and void.
Talking to reporters at Pathrakarthara Bhavan this morning, Arunkumar, the lead advocate of Pragabhi Associates, revealed that he filed PIL-Authentic Go well with (OS) No. 1762/2024 on the Court docket of the Principal Civil Decide and JMFC in Mysuru.
In accordance with the copy of the PIL shared with the media, Arunkumar, together with M. Sathish, a resident of Nazarbad, has named a number of defendants within the case, together with the Principal Secretary of the Division of City Improvement, Authorities of Karnataka, the Deputy Commissioner of Mysuru and the Commissioners of each MUDA and the Mysuru Metropolis Company (MCC).
Arunkumar has made a nine-point attraction to the Court docket in his PIL, outlining the next prayers:
Nullification of allotments: To completely declare all websites allotted underneath the 50:50 ratio scheme by MUDA since 2015 as null and void on account of improper software of the scheme and related irregularities.
Injunction towards additional transfers: To subject a everlasting injunction stopping MUDA from alienating or transferring any websites allotted underneath the 50:50 scheme till the problems are resolved and the validity of those allotments is absolutely reviewed.
Restriction on MUDA’s actions: To completely prohibit MUDA from persevering with any actions associated to the 50:50 ratio scheme and to remain all proceedings related to these allotments to make sure no additional actions are taken till an intensive investigation and determination are achieved legally.
Declaration of land possession: To completely declare that the land close to Ramakrishnanagar Circle underneath survey numbers 27.3, 27/1, 15/1, and 15/2, measuring about 17 acres and 21 guntas, belongs to MUDA.
Nullification of earlier allotments: To completely declare the websites allotted underneath the regime of the then MUDA Commissioners Dr. D.B. Natesh and G.T. Dinesh Kumar, together with schemes for little bit of land and incentive websites for land losers, as null and void.
Attachment of properties: To connect each movable and immovable properties of the then Commissioners Dr. Natesh and Dinesh Kumar to compensate for the loss incurred by MUDA on account of their actions in violation of the provisions of legislation.
Injunction towards beneficiaries: To restrain all beneficiaries of the above allotments from additional alienation of web sites allotted by the then MUDA Commissioners underneath the schemes together with schemes for little bit of land and incentive websites for land losers. These alienations should be declared null and void.
Additional alienation restraint: To restrain all beneficiaries of the above allotments from any additional alienation of the websites allotted underneath these schemes.
Injunction towards building licences: To restrain MUDA and the MCC from granting any licences for building or buying and selling actions on the websites allotted underneath these schemes since 2015.
The controversy surrounding the 50:50 website scheme escalated when it was emerged that Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s spouse, B.M. Parvathi, was a beneficiary of 14 websites within the upscale Vijayanagar Structure in Mysuru.