MUDA’s authorized division accuses former Commissioner of illegally exploiting 50:50 ratio website allotment scheme
Mysuru: A brand new controversy has surfaced involving the already suspended former Mysuru City Growth Authority (MUDA) Commissioner G.T. Dinesh Kumar, linked to the MUDA website allocation rip-off.
A observe from MUDA’s authorized division has uncovered that properties have been allotted to pick people underneath questionable circumstances.
On this specific case, an order was issued approving websites spanning 23,881 sq.ft. underneath 50:50 ratio inside seven days of the submission of software. Nevertheless, there isn’t any document of receiving the applying, in line with authorized division observe.
Sometimes, MUDA points an acceptance letter with a 21-day deadline to course of any software submitted. On this case, no official document or info quantity was entered concerning the applying’s acceptance within the division that accepts functions.
Quick-tracking software
This means that the applying in query was not submitted to MUDA following correct procedures. Information present that Dinesh Kumar fast-tracked this software in only a day and inside seven days, an order was issued approving the websites spanning 23,881 sq.ft. underneath the 50:50 ratio.
It wasn’t political or exterior affect that led Dinesh to expedite the applying. The applicant, Syed Yusuf, son of Syed Jafar from Rajendranagar, Mysuru, is neither a politician nor an individual of great affect. As an alternative, the authorized dept. observe has revealed that Dinesh acted out of non-public vested pursuits.
Compensation sought on Feb. 28, 2023
On Feb. 28, 2023, Syed Yusuf requested compensation for his 2.06-acre land in Survey Quantity 85/1 of Eeranagere village, Kasaba hobli, Mysuru taluk, which MUDA had acquired for a format with out formally following the land acquisition course of. He sought compensation underneath the 50:50 ratio. Nevertheless, there isn’t any proof that Syed Yusuf’s software was submitted to MUDA’s software acceptance division. The applying lacks an acceptance quantity, that means it wasn’t formally registered, and there’s no proof it ever reached the land acquisition division.
Based on the authorized division’s observe, the applying bears no reference quantity from the land acquisition division. As soon as the applying landed within the palms of Commissioner Dinesh Kumar, he responded instantly, presenting the file the very subsequent day.
Approval on Mar. 7, 2023
The file swiftly moved by way of numerous MUDA departments, and simply seven days later, on Mar. 7, 2023, Dinesh Kumar issued an order approving developed websites extending to 23,881 sq.ft compensation for the land MUDA utilized in Eeranagere.
The authorized division’s observe has raised severe considerations over the swift approval of the developed land in a 50:50 ratio inside simply seven days. This approval was granted with out registering the applying within the acceptance division and with none reference quantity from the land acquisition division, elevating pink flags.
Questionable RTC doc
Whereas Syed Yusuf holds an RTC (Document of Rights, Tenancy, and Crops) for two.06 acres of land in Survey Quantity 85/1 of Eeranagere, mentioning his buy of land. Nevertheless, there isn’t any concrete proof supporting his buy. The authorized division’s observe additional questions the validity of his identify being entered into the RTC.
Moreover, when submitting functions to MUDA, any photocopies of paperwork should be licensed. But, not one of the paperwork submitted concerning this land have been licensed copies, in line with the authorized division’s findings.
The observe emphasises that approving a website in a 50:50 ratio inside seven days, based mostly solely on uncertified photocopies and with out verifying possession, means that then Commissioner Dinesh Kumar issued the order in clear violation of rules.
No verification report
If the previous Commissioner authorized the compensatory websites underneath the 50:50 scheme with such velocity for the two.06 acres of land in Survey Quantity 85/1 of Eeranagere for a format with out acquisition, the query arises: Which format was it?
The file incorporates no verification report or particulars explaining which format was developed or why MUDA failed to accumulate the land in that individual survey quantity. The authorized division alleges that Dinesh Kumar didn’t even try to receive a verification report for the file.
Moreover, the land referenced within the software doesn’t match the precise sale deed. Upon evaluate, the two.06 acres in Sy. No 85/1 of Eeranagere shouldn’t be registered to Yusuf in first place.
As an alternative, the sale deed exhibits that different websites — Survey Numbers 84/2 (1.35 acres), 87/1 (0.22 acres), 91/2 (1.15 acres), and 92/2 (1.18 acres) — are registered to Syed Yusuf alias Sabdu and Syed Saheb, son of Syed Abdul Rahim Saheb.
This inconsistency, famous within the authorized division’s report, reveals that the land talked about in Yusuf’s software does not correspond to the land recorded within the RTC.