An internet collection concerning the 1999 hijacking of an Indian passenger aircraft has sparked an issue within the nation over the portrayal of a number of the characters.
Directed by Anubhav Sinha for Netflix, IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack recounts the occasions surrounding the hijacking of a Kathmandu-Delhi flight which was taken to Taliban-ruled Kandahar to demand the discharge of militants jailed in India.
The negotiations lasted eight days, ensuing within the Indian authorities releasing three militants, together with Masood Azhar, in change for the passengers.
India has blamed Azhar, who based the Jaish-e-Mohammad group after his launch, for a number of assaults within the nation. He has additionally been designated as a terrorist by the United Nations.
The choice to launch Azhar and others stays controversial in India, with the opposition usually criticising the governing Bharatiya Janata Occasion (BJP), which was additionally in energy in 1999, for the transfer.
Now, a brand new collection concerning the hijacking has sparked a row.
What’s the controversy?
The six-episode mini-series relies on Flight Into Worry: The Captain’s Story, a e book by Devi Sharan, who captained the hijacked aircraft, and journalist Srinjoy Chowdhury.
The collection, which was launched final week, begins with the hijackers making their means into the flight on the Tribhuvan Worldwide Airport in Kathmandu.
Inside minutes of take-off, the militants announce the flight – carrying 179 passengers together with the 5 hijackers and 11 crew members – has been hijacked.
The collection focuses on the interactions between the hijackers, the crew and the passengers, and it additionally exhibits Indian authorities officers working to resolve the disaster.
The row started after some social media customers criticised the filmmakers for depicting the hijackers calling one another frequent Hindu names reminiscent of Bhola and Shankar, though their names have been Ibrahim Athar, Shahid Akhtar Sayed, Sunny Ahmed Qazi, Mistri Zahoor Ibrahim and Shakir. All of them have been from Pakistan.
BJP chief Amit Malviya mentioned in a publish on X (previously Twitter) that by utilizing the hijackers’ “non-Muslim” aliases within the collection, the filmmakers had ensured that folks would “suppose Hindus hijacked IC-814”.
A Hindu right-wing organisation has filed a case in a Delhi court docket in search of a ban on the collection. PTI information company reported that the petition has accused the filmmaker of distorting essential info and misrepresenting historic occasions.
A number of Indian media shops, citing sources, reported that the federal authorities held a gathering with a senior Netflix govt relating to the difficulty.
Netflix and India’s data and broadcasting ministry haven’t responded to the BBC’s request for remark.
What are the info?
Many have additionally defended the collection, saying that it’s factually correct.
A assertion issued by India’s house ministry in 2000 confirms that the hijackers used such names as aliases to speak inside and outdoors the plane.
“To the passengers of the hijacked place these hijackers got here to be recognized respectively as (1) Chief, (2) Physician, (3) Burger, (4) Bhola, and (5) Shankar, the names by which the hijackers invariably addressed each other,” the assertion mentioned.
Witnesses and journalists who reported on the incident have additionally corroborated this prior to now.
Kollattu Ravikumar, a survivor of the hijacking who labored as a service provider navy captain for a US-based agency, confirmed the aliases in an article on Rediff information portal in 2000.
“The 4 hijackers who have been watching over us additionally had a pacesetter known as Berger. It was Berger who used to usually shout. As Berger known as them, I caught the names of the others – Bola, Shankar and Physician,” he mentioned.
This isn’t the primary time that worldwide streaming platforms have obtained backlash over content material on their platforms in India.
In January, Netflix eliminated a Tamil-language movie after members of hard-line Hindu organisations objected to a number of scenes. In 2021, the forged and crew of an Amazon Prime present, Tandav, apologised after being accused of mocking Hindu gods.